by jim1 Fri 05 Apr 2013, 8:31 pm
I tested the Evo and the S610 Sub around Bernese, and I was a second quicker in the Sub. I thought it handled ok if you were careful with the brakes so as not to unsteady the car. The Sub is quicker in the straights, and this track has a lot of straights.
I think it depends on the track, on some tracks the cars are pretty equal, on tracks with lots of corners and hairpins the Evo is quicker, on tracks with lots of straights the Sub is quicker - in generaly I have found the Evo is more consistent to drive, the Sub my lap times are up and down because it is not as easy to put the car where you want on the track.
I tested the Sub S609 tune for 2 laps and I beat my previous best Sub time by 0.2 seconds. If I carried on lapping, I would have increased that margin I'm sure. Im not sure about other tracks, but by improving the handling of the Sub, it might have potentially made it quite a bit quicker than the Evo - and we are back to square 1 lol.
If your asking my opinion, I think we should use the S610 Sub and the Evo and leave it at that. We will never get them perfectly equal, and they are pretty close as they are - some tracks are always going to benefit 1 over the other depending on the track layout.
Maybe for the next series, if it has 2 or 3 cars, we could make it so you could only use the car for half the tracks and then you had to use the other car for the remaining tracks, so it is more tactical? Rather than trying to balance the cars perfectly because it is a losing battle I think.